Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:27

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
NYC Heat Triggers Blackout as Soaring Temperatures Stress US Grids - Bloomberg.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
At what stage in your life did you realize, "No, I can't do this any more" and walk out? Why?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Kate Middleton shares heartfelt message after unexpectedly pulling out of Royal Ascot - Page Six
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How is AI influencing interior design in 2025?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.